If uni.cont. function sequence fn on (0,1) is uni.conv. to f on (0,1) then f is uni.con.t on (0,1)?

Hello, today I have a question.

If uni.cont. function sequence fn on (0,1) is uni.conv. to f on (0,1), then f is uni.cont. on (0,1).

The above…

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s